----- Forwarded Message -----http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/screenshots-prove-it-new-york-times-altered-headline-remove-words-israeli
The screenshots prove it: New York Times altered headline to remove words "Israeli-occupied"
Submitted by Ali Abunimah on Sat, 01/12/2013 - 00:28
2013-1-11_ny_times_change_headline_close_up.jpg
Cached image of New York Times story before headline was changed to omit words "Israeli-occupied West Bank."
A New York Times headline accidentally told the truth today about Israel's occupation of Palestinian land, before it was 'fixed.'
The story is about today's action by Palestinians to establish a village called Bab Al Shams on land that Israel has seized for construction of Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank.
The original headline read "Palestinians Set Up Camp in Israeli-Occupied West Bank Territory." Later, the headline was altered to remove the words "Israeli-occupied." It now reads "Palestinians Set Up Tents Where Israel Plans Homes."
The website Newsdiffs.org shows that the original headline was posted at 1:09 PM EST. It was discovered to have been changed at 7:10 PM EST.
A key goal of Israeli propaganda is to eliminate the term "occupied" from media coverage of Israel's, well, occupation. Many media have adopted terms like "disputed" that grant false legitimacy to Israeli claims to the land which are totally null and void in international law.
The Times article still describes the area as "hotly contested piece of Israeli-occupied West Bank territory known as E1." And yes, I've taken a screenshot in case they decide to change that too.
palestinians_set_up_camp_in_israeli-occupied_west_bank_territory_-_nytimes.com_.jpg
How the headline appears after the change.
Thanks to Twitter user @JamieSW for spotting.
More like this
Defying occupier, Palestinians establish "Bab Al Shams" village on land seized for Jewish settlement
11 January 2013As Israeli occupiers threaten forced expulsion, dozens more Palestinians join Bab Al Shams
12 January 2013Eviction of Bab Al Shams exposes Israel as a lawless state
14 January 2013| |RamallahViolating court order, Israeli occupiers forcibly remove Bab Al Shams village from Palestinian land
13 January 2013
Latest Articles
- Opinion/Editorial: Why did a rogue group of Occupy activists smear me with "terror" claim? (16 January 2013)
- Development: Stop playing by Israel's rules, aid workers urged (15 January 2013)
- Diaries: Live from Palestine: Making history in Bab Al Shams (15 January 2013)
- Activism News: Eviction of Bab Al Shams exposes Israel as a lawless state (14 January 2013)
- Opinion/Editorial: BBC's cruel excuses for ignoring Palestinian hunger strikes (10 January 2013)
- Opinion/Editorial: Israel's wall will destroy my birthplace, Battir (9 January 2013)
- Activism News: Palestinian children's photography showcased in Scottish Parliament (8 January 2013)
- Opinion/Editorial: Can we find compassion for Israelis in 2013? (4 January 2013)
- Human Rights: Four years on, young girl still stunted by Cast Lead (4 January 2013)
- Diaries: Live from Palestine: The Month in Pictures: December 2012 (4 January 2013)
Latest blog posts
- Media Watch: Subscription offer from liberal Israeli newspaper helps JNF, a "charity" implicated in ethnic cleansing (16 January 2013)
- Media Watch: BBC Trust upholds complaint over Nakba Day radio report that downplayed expulsion of Palestinians (16 January 2013)
- Activism and BDS Beat: Israeli fake peace group One Voice reveals its anti-Palestinian bigotry in Facebook graphics (16 January 2013)
- Power Suits: End "apartheid," ensure "one person, one vote" in Palestine says brief from influential EU think tank (15 January 2013)
- Ali Abunimah: German officials more outraged by rapper Bushido's "Free Palestine" avatar than by all Israel's crimes (15 January 2013)
- Lobby Watch: Israel named "world humanitarian leader" in EU propaganda exercise (14 January 2013)
- Lobby Watch: UK-based Israel lobby group whitewashes war crimes to protect two-state solution (14 January 2013)
- Rights and Accountability: Settlement firms don't benefit Palestinians, says study (14 January 2013)
- Activism and BDS Beat: BDS roundup: In latest setback, Veolia Water drops California contract bid following boycott campaign (14 January 2013)
- Shahd Abusalama: Jerusalem family anxiously awaits return of son after 25 years in Israeli prison (13 January 2013)
Comments
URL Still Reads "Occupied"
TYPICAL OF THE NYT
NYT bias
The subheading also mentiones these two words
"Palestinians erected tents in the contested piece of Israeli-occupied West Bank territory known as E1 on Friday.". What's the big deal - everyone could make a mistake or reorganise text. Don't blame the paper - it's usually a single person. Have you never made a mistake at your job? I know people who sent an email around corporations with thousands of employees saying horrible things about their bosses :) or imagine you are a CEO and by mistake distribute a new about jobs cuttings!
PEACE
I think NYT lifted headline
Young but not stupid
Expansion of occupied territories
And don't forget ...
Diverse opinions within NY Times
new york times, are you the
Newsdiffs
http://www.newsdiffs.org/article-history/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.c...
USA and Zionists
Add new comment